My D7000 is a 16 mp camera and the number of pixels isn't a limit for printing unless the image was shot at high ISO (3200+). I have some nice 16X20 prints from my 10 mp D80 and even one from my old D70 (6 mp camera). How will they be displayed? Online? Photo books? Poster-size wall hangers? The kind of digital image that the final print demands is your best starting point.Ĭropping a 810 image to DX size will yield a 16 mp image, compared to the original 36 mp in the D810 and 24 mp in the D7200. With a teleconverter the IQ goes down as well as the AF-speed and, not to forget, you lose a stop introducing more noise, more blur, a shallower DOF or a combination of these factors.Įither way, that 70-200 lens is usually going to be way too short for wildlife and for many sports.Ī very large factor in making the best choice for you is what you intend to do with the resulting images. when comparing a crop camera vs a full-frame. However, the pixels are a bit 'better' and sometimes the images will look the same. Escpecially with birds, you almost always have to crop, unless you live in the few areas in the world where animals are not shy.Ī D810 crop will have a lower image quality because there are less pixels on the target. That's the only thing that really matters. The answer is hidden in your text: double surface area and 35% more pixels means a considerably lower pixel density.
If I used the D810 and cropped the image to get the same field of view as the D7200, would I see the same image quality? Size, weight, and cost of APS-C lenses are not an issue or deciding factor here.
I am wondering what, if any, advantage there may be in using the APS-C body. The D810 sensor has more than double the surface area and about 35% more pixels than the D7200. I currently use a Nikon D810 (landscape, macro, portraits, etc.) and I’m considering purchasing a D7200 to take advantage of the crop factor for sports & wildlife.
0 kommentar(er)
